Beware: 100% Green Energy Could Destroy the Planet

- TOWNHALL - Stephen Moore - JUN 7, 2022 -

Source: AP Photo/Evan Vucci

The untold story about "green energy" is that it can't possibly be scaled up to provide anywhere near the energy to replace fossil fuels. (Unless we are headed back to the stone ages, which is what some of the "de-growth" advocates favor).


CLIQUE AQUI E CONHEÇA OS LIVROS DE MINHA AUTORIA >>>

https://www.heitordepaola.online/meuslivros


Right now, the United States gets about 70% of its energy from fossil fuels. To go to zero over the next 20 years would be economically catastrophic and cost tens of millions of jobs. With gas prices at nearly double their price back from when Donald Trump left office and inflation up from 1.5% to 8% in just 15 months, we are already experiencing the economic damage from the green energy crusaders.


But we also have to ask whether green energy is even good for the environment. Some environmentalists are pointing to a little-noticed study by the World Bank showing that moving toward 100% solar, wind and electric battery energy would be just as destructive to the planet as fossil fuels. This was precisely the conclusion of a story in Foreign Policy magazine, hardly a right-wing publication.


According to the Foreign Policy analysis, moving to a "carbon-free" energy future "requires massive amounts of energy, not to mention the extraction of minerals and metals at great environmental and social costs."


Here are some of the numbers. Going all-in on batteries, solar and wind would require:


-- 34 million metric tons of copper


-- 40 million tons of lead


-- 50 million tons of zinc


-- 162 million tons of aluminum


-- 4.8 billion tons of iron


Those tens of millions of windmills, solar panels and electric batteries for cars and trucks aren't exactly biodegradable. So, we will have the most prominent energy graveyard with toxic pollutants that will be 100 times larger than any nuclear waste storage. And yet, the Left is worried about plastic straws!


I'm all for mining for America's bountiful natural resources of copper, lead, magnesium and precious metals. But ironically, it's the greens that want to shut down mines, which is like saying you want food, but you oppose farming. Talk about cognitive dissonance.


Then, the land space is needed for the windmills and solar panels. Bloomberg reports that getting to zero carbon by 2050 would require a land area equal to five South Dakotas "to develop enough clean power to run all the electric vehicles, factories, and more."


In other words, the liberals are calling for a full-scale industrialization of America's wilderness and landscape.


LEIA MAIS >

https://townhall.com/columnists/stephenmoore/2022/06/07/beware-100-green-energy-could-destroy-the-planet-n2608294


CLIQUE AQUI E CONHEÇA OS LIVROS DE MINHA AUTORIA >>>

https://www.heitordepaola.online/meuslivros


18 views0 comments